Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Philip Sekulic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs P. Sekulic

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

520

128

Best Rank

225

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$92.4K

Plays

Philip Sekulic

AUS

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

520

128

Best Rank

225

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$92.4K

Plays

Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 2 Sekulic

They have played 5 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 and Philip Sekulic winning 4. The last match between Philip Sekulic and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 28-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	0
Sekulic	2

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Yokkaichi Challenger(11-28-24)

Stats

Philip Sekulic

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

(R1) Chicago Challenger(07-22-24)

Stats

Philip Sekulic

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

C. L. C. Wong vs P. Sekulic H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	P. Sekulic
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$92,390
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	55.51% (131-105)
0	Hard	2
2	Titles	0
0	Total H2H Matches	2
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. L. C. Wong vs P. Sekulic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19% of points on their second serve, while Philip Sekulic has won 42.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 45.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Philip Sekulic has won 45.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.26% and 29.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Philip Sekulic has saved 50.70% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Philip Sekulic winning 54.05% (W/L 20/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Philip Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 4/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Philip Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0 times and Philip Sekulic being victorious 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 and Philip Sekulic winning 4.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Philip Sekulic was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 28-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:17.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.05 while Philip Sekulic has played against players with an average rank of 340.35.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Philip Sekulic has won 90% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Philip Sekulic has converted 30.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Philip Sekulic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs P. Sekulic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	P. Sekulic
0	H2H Matches Won	2
1	Sets Won	4
16	Games Won	26
11	Aces (Total)	0
4	Total Double Faults	8
1:25:17	Average Match Time	1:25:17
65% (86/133)	1st Serve %	64% (74/115)
71% (61/86)	1st Serve Win %	73% (54/74)
34% (16/47)	2nd Serve Win %	56% (23/41)
100% (3/3)	Break Pts Won %	38% (8/21)
33% (38/115)	Return Points Win %	42% (56/133)
0% (0/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Sekulic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Playford Challenger - 24-11-2025
QF Dane SweenyD. Sweeny	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R2 Bernard TomicB. Tomic	W	3-6 7-6(4) 6-4	Stats
R1 Cruz HewittC. Hewitt	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Sydney Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Alex BoltA. Bolt	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Emile HuddE. Hudd	W	6-3 2-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs P. Sekulic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	P. Sekulic
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	55.51% (131/105)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	54.28% (298/251)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	51.88% (2746/2547)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	57.14% (116/87)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (10/12)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (1/3)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (4/3)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.37
1687	Aces Total	945
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.26
603	Total Double Faults	660
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:49:54
371.21	Average Opponent Rank	435.06
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	63% (10278/16371)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	69% (7122/10278)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (3049/6093)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (659/1574)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	39% (6300/16083)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	66.67% (2/1)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (3/3)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	48.70% (56/59)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	64.49% (69/38)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (130/231)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (42/85)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (45/80)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (127/110)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (127/16)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (109/21)